BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO (8)
Teks Asal
Pernyataan Masalah
Jadi bab 1 kita teruskan 1.3 pernyataan masalah. Okey penyataan masalah ataupun masalah. Okey. Dalam pernyataan masalah. Biasanya pelajar mempunyai masalah. Dah nama pun pernyataan masalah. Masalah-masalah macam mana nak tulis pernyataan masalah ini. Ni sangat kritikal dan sangat penting. Kadang-kadang pelajar dia letak sampai 10 halaman masalah nak huraikan tentang pernyataan masalah. Bila kita baca langsung tiada masalah. Jadi berhati-hati. Dan juga pelajar selalu letak pernyataan masalah yang dia rasa. Macam saya dapati pelajar tidak pandai mengira 1 sampai 10. Awak tu siapa. Jadi kita tak boleh. Kita kena ada rujukan. Pernyataan masalah, rujukan, perkara yang penting. Maknanya kita perlu rujuk. Siapa yang punya kajian yang menunjukkan bahawa ada masalah dalam kajian tersebut. Ataupun kenyataan daripada orang ini. Daripada Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), mendapati bahawa pelajar kurang berminat untuk mendengar ataupun untuk mendengar cerita berbentuk sekian sekian. Jadi itu dah menunjukkan benda negatif. Dan juga huraian daripada Normaliza Abd Rahim itu mendapati bahawa 5 pelajar didapati tidak boleh menggunakan kata kerja dalam dalam penulisan karangan contohnya. Dan itu dah nampak masalah. Sebab masalah itu bila kita dapati, kita huraikan sikit. Kemudian masalah Normaliza Abd Rahim tu tadi disokong oleh kajian yang dijalankan oleh Nur Maisarah Roslan (2019). Yang mendapati bahawa pelajar tidak dapat mengenal pasti kata kerja dalam membina soalan contohnya. Jadi, adalah sokong. Dua kajian ini sokong bahawa timbulnya masalah tersebut. Okey, barulah betul. Jadi itu yang menunjukkan masalah huraian kita tu. Jadi sekarang pelajar biasanya nak tahu dia buat macam mana dia buat. Okey, contohnya kajian itu tentang kata kerja. Yang awak punya kajian tentang kata adjektif. Contohnya. Jadi awak boleh buat kajian oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim tidak terfokus kepada kajian, contohnya. Itu dikatakan menentang salah. Salah. Tidak boleh. Tidak boleh. Macam seolah-olah, memang dia buat kata kerja sebab dia berfokus kepada kata-kata kerja. Tetapi awak tak boleh kata dia tak buat pasal kata adjektif. Memanglah dia tak buat kata adjektif tu. Sebab dia kata kerja. Jadi salah dia. Jadi huraian di sini. Macam saya katakan tadi. Perlu ada ayat yang dijatuhkan oleh pengkaji tersebut, dalam artikelnya. Jadi pernyataan masalah ini sama bagi objektif. Kalau contoh objektif ada dua. Ada dua perenggan yang di sini. Kalau objektif ada tiga, bermakna ada tiga perenggan. 1,2,3 jadi huraian dalam ini orang yang daripada kajian dan disokong oleh siapa. Okey ayat macam saya katakan tadi ya. Kemudian hujung ayat ni, awak kata justeru kajian ini. Sebab berkaitan. Dah nampak jurang penyelidikan dia dalam ni. Justeru kajian ini ingin mengenalpasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi bla bla bla. Sebab didapati bahawa kajian itu mendapati pelajar, contohnya pelajar ataupun skrip animasi tidak melambangkan apa dia apa dia. Jadi itu kajian menurut orang-orang tu bercakap. Bukan kita yang bercakap. Jadi serupa jugalah dengan ni, kena ada sokong. Kajian ini mendapati ada masalah dalam tu. Pelajar tidak boleh mengenal pasti kata adjektif contohnya. Kemudian justeru kajian ini ingin menganalisis kata adjektif yang terdapat dalam penulisan karangan kanak-kanak. Macam contoh pernyataan masalah ketiga. Menurut Nur Widad Roslan (2019) yang mendapati bahawa pelajar tidak berminat dan tidak boleh mengira nombor 1 sehingga 20 contohnya. Kajian dia didapati begitu. Jadi, justeru kajian ini ingin menganalisis pengiraan ataupun aktiviti pelajar dalam mengira nombor 1 sehingga 20. Perenggan itu kaitkan dengan objektif ini. Hujung ayat ini kaitkan dengan objektif ini. Hujung ayat ini kaitkan dengan objektif ketiga. Jadi barulah ada pernyataan masalah yang berkaitan dengan awak punya objektif. Jadi rujukan. Rujukan dalam masalah kajian ini perlulah lima tahun ke belakang. Kita tak bolehla ambik pernyataan masalah daripada kajian lama-lama. Sebab kita kena faham kajian yang dilakukan sekarang ini semuanya dah berbeza. Berbeza dengan kita mempunyai teknik. Kita dah dunia digital. Jadi budak-budak pon pandai. Macam saya katakan sebelum ini. Zaman dulu bolehla kata budak ini pandai betul. Cerdik betul. Kita tanya satu soalan dia jawab sepuluh jawapan. Pandai. Tetapi dalam dunia digital sekarang ini berbeza. Yang mana sekarang ini kita bagi satu soalan, dia jawab sampai 47. Sampai kita kata okay berhenti. Jangan bagi jawapan dah. Letih cikgu nak dengar. Jadi ada budak-budak tu sampai sekarang macam ni ya. Dia lebih ke hadapan sebab kita dah ada dunia digital ni. Masing-masing ada dah telefon mudah alih telefon bimbit masing-masing dalam beg. Kadang-kadang telefon dia lebih mahal daripada telefon kita. Bertabahla la kita ya. Jadi pastikan pernyataan masalah ini betul. Tak perlu panjang lebar. Kerana apa yang terdapat rujukan dalam ini dan dalam ini, semuanya ada huraian yang lebih panjang lebar dalam bab 2. Jadi penyataan masalah ni nama-nama ni mesti ada lah dalam bab 2. Tak bolehlah awak ada nama nama ni. Kemudian pemeriksa kata eh mana perginya nama-nama awak dah kata dalam pernyataan masalah. Tak ada dalam bab 2. Tak boleh. Ini secara ringkas, yang dikatakan tentang penyataan masalah ini. Ini kita secara terperinci tentang kajian ini seluruhnya. Tentang orang orang ini Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Kajian dia secara menyeluruh dengan panjang lebar. Jadi maknanya kena adalah. Nama awak ambil di sini mesti ada dalam ini. Pastikan betul. Pernyataan masalah ini. Amat penting. Biasanya pelajar didapati agak sukar untuk menulis pernyataan masalah. Jadi sekarang bila dah belajar ini. Dah takde masalah.
Terjemahan
So, chapter 1 we continued 1.3 problem statements. Okay, statements of problems or problems. Okay. In a statement of problems. Usually students have problems. The name is a problem statement. Problems like how to write a statement of this problem. Ni is very critical and very important. Sometimes the students he put up to 10 pages of problems describe the problem statement. When we read directly there was no problem. So be careful. And also, the student always put a statement of the problem he feels. Like I found students not good at counting 1 to 10. You're who. So, we can't. We have to have references. Problem statements, references, important points. That means we need to refer to. Who had a study showing that there were problems in the study, or statements from this person. From Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), it was discovered that students were less interested in listening or to hear stories in shape for so many. So that has shown negative things. And also, a description from Normaliza Abd Rahim found that 5 students were found to be unable to use verbs in essay writing for example. And that's got to see the problem. Because of the problem when we find it, we describe the slice. Then Normaliza Abd Rahim's problems were supported by a study conducted by Nur Maisarah Roslan (2019). That found that students could not identify verbs in building questions for example. So, being supportive. Two of these studies supported that the onset of the problem. Okay, just right. So that shows the problem of our description that. So now students usually want to know him for how he makes. Okay, for example, is the study of workwords. You have studies on ad objective words. For example. So you can do a study by Normaliza Abd Rahim not focused on the study, for example. That is said to be against wrongdoing. Wrong. No, you cannot. No, you cannot. So, seems, indeed he made a sedation because he focused on working words. But you can't say he doesn't make an adjective word. Indeed, he did not make an adjective word. The reason he's awkward. So wrong he is. So, description here. Like I said earlier. There should be verses dropped by the reviewer, in his article. So, the statement of the problem is the same for the objective. If an example of the objective is two. There are two paragraphs here. If the objective is three, meaning there are three paragraphs. 1,2,3 so description in this person who is out of the study and is supported by whom. Okey verse like I said earlier yes. Then the end of this verse, you said this study. Related reasons. Dah sees the research gap he is in ni. Hence, this study would like to identify the textual discourse of bla bla scripts. The reason it was found that the study found students, for example students or animated scripts did not symbolize what he was. So that's a study according to those talking. Not us who speak. So similar to this, there is support. The study found there were problems in that. Students cannot identify adjective words for example. Hence, this study would like to analyze the adjective words found in the writing of children's essences. Sort of an example of a third problem statement. According to Nur Widad Roslan (2019) who found that students were uninterested and cannot count numbers 1 up to 20 for example. The study he found so. So, therefore, this study would like to analyze the calculations or activities of students in calculating numbers 1 to 20. The paragraph relates to this objective. The end of this verse is associated with this objective. The end of this verse is associated with the third objective. So, there is a statement of problems related to you as having the objectives. So, a reference. References in this study problem should be five years backwards. We cannot relieve a statement of problems from the old studies. The reason we understand the studies done nowadays are all dah different. Unlike we have techniques. We have a digital world. So, the boys also are clever. Like I said it before. The old days could say this boy is cleverly correct. Dodgy is right. We asked a question he answered ten answers. Clever. But in the digital world now this is different. Which is now ours for a question, he answers up to 47. Until we say okay stops. Don't for answers dah. Tired of teachers to hear. So, there are boys up to now sort of yes. He is more forward because we have a digital world. Each of them has their own mobile phone in the bag. Sometimes his phone is more expensive than our phones. Please patient us yes. So, make sure the problem statement is correct. There is no need for long width. Because of what there are references in this and in this, everything has a longer description of the width in chapter 2. So, the statement of problems these names must be in chapter 2. You can't have a name. Then the examiner eh where you go with your names and words in the troubleshooting statement. Not in chapter 2. Can't. This is brief, which is said about the statement of this problem. This is in detail about this whole review. About this person Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). The study he comprehensively at length. So, the meaning of getting to it is. The name you take here must be in this. Make sure it's right. Statement of this problem. Very important. Usually students are found to be quite difficult to write a problem statement. So now when it comes to learning this. So, didn't have a problem.
Sumber Rujukan
Prof. Normaliza Abd Rahim (2020). Pernyataan Masalah / Masalah Kajian (Bab 1) #JomTulisTesis. Dicapai pada 8 Januari 2021 daripada https://youtu.be/9eGx4GgpLb4.
Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Bukti sudah subscribe:
Comments
Post a Comment